75 years ago, a mysterious light in the sky sparked rumors of UFOs. Now, researchers offer two alarming explanations

Investigators have been struggling to explain the seemingly endless light, or time, observed in the sky since the 1950s. Surprisingly, we still don’t know what these unknown objects are behind the planes – or ordinary, unidentified flying objects.

In two papers published earlier this month, one in a publication of the Pacific Astronomical Society and another in Scientific Reports, researchers put forward two new, striking explanations for these conditions. They analyze Trances written on photographic plates (Praderronts to Photolic Films) from the beginning of the 1950s – This light was shown before Sputnik I, at least some of these activities were true nuclear weapons tests and Ups reports.

“Today we know that a short flash of light often shows domesticated flowers, shaped like satellites,” Beatriz Villarrolel, the meeting’s statement on both studies, said in a statement by the two. But before 1957, there were no man-made objects in space – or at least, none that we know of. And while it’s possible that the country had secretly started something in space, that would have been difficult to do without being noticed, according to German Movikist and Science Communicator favorite Sabine Hossenfelder.

CASTIONS, Ups, and Nuclear Tests

In the period of scientific reports, Villarroel and his colleagues analyzed more than 106,000 cases of certain periods and found several small but statistically significant associations between them and the reports of nuclear weapons tests above during the 1950s. Specifically, volunteers often appear the day after a nuclear test. They also point to a positive correlation between the amount of light in the sky and the number of Ups reports on any given day on any given day. In addition, most of the time it happened at the same time as a nuclear test, and one UAP report.

The investigators put forward two possible hypotheses: that the nuclear test could create an object in space that appears as a flash or a moment, which the UAP reports are soft and appears in astronomical images. It also depends on an existing piece of what researchers call “lore”: that a nuclear test could trigger a UAP.

“While this has been suspected for decades based on anecdotal evidence, it has until now lacked systematic supporting data,” the researchers wrote in the paper. “In this latter hypothesis, our results can be viewed as showing that the Trans have objects that are intelligently made, that reflect or in high paths around the earth or in high places within the atmosphere or high within the atmosphere or high within the atmosphere or in high places within the atmosphere.”

“How that could be and how this hypothesis can be tested and how is still to be determined. Regardless of what time frames they are, our results add to the growing body of evidence that supports the true interpretation., Rather than emulsion problems,” they conclude.

Motivational things

In another paper, Villarroel and his colleagues looked for historical evidence of the world’s most spectacular events. To do this, they look for CHADIETs in the data that seem to follow a pattern, suggesting that they may be children, indicators, and motivations.

They found two interesting events, one, in particular, occurred on July 27, 1952-during the week when there were few UFO sightings in Washington, indicating that at least some of the light may be reflected by the sun from an orbital point high above the earth.

“When what is said as the sound on the plates, it seems that there is a real number of events that we have, among other things,” Villarrorroel, an astrologer, in the Noodic form of the Nooretical of Stockholm University, explained in a statement.

“You don’t get that kind of optical reflection from spherical objects like asteroids or dust ribs, which leave streaks during a 50-minute exposure, but only if something is very flat and reflects sunlight in a short flash.”

The new analysis is surprising. But more work will need to be done before researchers can say definitively what that there is something.