Us News

The Supreme Court could decide to end Trump’s immigration order

– For todayNow you can listen to FOX news headlines!

In America, we the people are the sovereign citizens. Our power to rule comes from God in us. We borrow the power of our Federal and State governments through a loan agreement called a loan agreement.

This is very different from Great Britain, where we have escaped, where the king or queen has the power of the monarchy – and the hands are the crumbs of the spirit to put their pointers like documents like Magna Carta. Our most important power, as we humans, control our border and people. We have never given this power to unelected judges. Not in our founding and fifth amendment movement. Not after the civil war and the passage of the fourteenth amendment. Not in any subsequent Congress. Certainly not after the last election. Just judges do not have the power to steal from us the sovereign power of the people to control our borders and people. This includes the important issue of firstborn citizenship.

The Trump Girderight Puretizen Fight Returns to the Supreme Court as a New Era Begins

Made after the civil war to ensure citizenship for these freed slaves and their descendants, the fourth amendment is called for those people to be under the United States government and receive citizenship citizenship. This expression has, over the decades, developed an absurd and unfair meaning and puts Ithemba into illegal anger. Like the children of foreign embassies or troops of occupation, illegal immigrants are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Instead, citizens of other countries face their own countries. For this reason, illegal immigrants cannot serve in the military or government. Instead, they came to the United States and found jobs secretly, paid under the table, to avoid detection.

Demonstrators hold an anti-Trump sign outside the US Supreme Court in Washington, DC, on June 27, 2025. (Alex wroblewski / AFP via Getty Images)

The Supreme Court was issued from it Elk v. Wilkins . Congress then passed a statement granting birthright citizenship to them. Answer this throwaway question: If virtual citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment does not apply to American Indians, in which country does it apply to illegal aliens? It just isn’t.

If illegal immigrants are not under the jurisdiction of the United States, it makes no sense that their children are. If a child is born to American parents in another country, that child is American; For example, many military children are born overseas. Logically, the reverse must also be true.

A woman holds a Sign Protesting Donald Tutioly Pudelight

Olga Urbina and her 9-month-old son ares ares bebster participated in a protest outside the Supreme Court over President Donald Trump’s move to end birthright citizenship on May 15, 2025. (Draw Angercher/AFP via Getty Images)

President Trump, who has a similar public opinion on this issue, signed an executive order on January 20. The order indicates that the children of mothers who come from the law temporarily do not have American citizens or legal status. This order does not receive children who are born here; Instead, it only applies to children born 30 days after the order goes into effect.

If customary citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment does not apply to American Indians, in what country would it include illegal aliens?

The order is yet to take effect because several courts have appealed it immediately. This June, the Supreme Court significantly reduced the country’s vaccination coverage to Trump v. Casa; However, the district judges continued to enjoin the large order on the basis that the Plaintiffs’ classes have the same general question – the legal challenge of the order – and the states can challenge it. The administration has sought review by the Supreme Court before decisions by any court of law. This filing, known as a petition for certiorari before judgment, is rare, as the Supreme Court prefers that cases proceed in the usual order. However, it is a case against natural born citizens, and the Supreme Court must grant this request.

In a photo on the side of protesters showing the Trump Administration's immigration policies, and a photo of US President Donald Trump signing the White House Executive Orders. The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday, May 14, in a case involving citizenship and compassion in the US Photos by Getty Images

In a photo on the side of protesters showing the Trump Administration’s immigration policies, and a photo of US President Donald Trump signing the White House Executive Orders. The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday, May 14, in a case involving citizenship and compassion in the US Photos by Getty Images (Pet Pictures)

In addition to the legal reasons why President Trump’s order should survive any challenge, there are important policy issues at stake. Many illegal immigrants want to have children in the United States so those children can enjoy the benefits of American citizenship. Illegal aliens will risk their lives in many cases, either drowning in the Rio Grande or dying in the sweltering wilderness. Most illegals pay smugglers to help them cross the border. Many of these smugglers are violent and engage in armed conflicts with Border Patrol agents, endangering the lives of providers, illegal mothers, and illegal unborn children. In short, the current policy of first-born citizenship imposes illegal anger and results in many harmful restrictions. This absurd policy must change, and President Trump deserves a lot of credit for trying to do so.

Click here for more Fox News information

Leftists have asserted in the media and in the lawsuit that President Trump’s order is clearly illegal. The Supreme Court, however, has never addressed the specific question of whether children born to illegal immigrants are entitled to American citizenship. between United States v. Wong Kim Ark . The court said that such children are because their status as permanent and legal citizens reflects their allegiance to (“subject to the rule of”) the United States. President Trump’s big order, however, has nothing to do with law-abiding citizens. The order deals with illegality and those here, for example, temporary protected status. Thus, Ong Kim Ark it is invalid, and President Trump is not, unlike the rest of the claims, defying the Supreme Court’s foundation. Residents judge the judges, on the contrary, they violate our great power to control our borders and people.

Our nation has a serious problem with illegal immigration. More than 10 million are illegal – and maybe more than 20 million are pouring into the United States because of President BIDEN’s Abysmal border policy. Biden, border Czar Kamala Harris, and Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Alejandro Alejandro has spent four shameful years disrupting our border, creating a Flood of illegal immigrants in cities across the country. Some of these are illegal against Americans, they commit murder, rape, armed robbery and home invasion.

Some illegals joined or were members of international terrorist organizations such as Tren de Aragua. And some illegals have made money by selling drugs, including alentanyl-laced narcotics that have claimed many American lives. Admirably he set himself up to fix the Biden border crisis, but lower court judges blocked his legitimate effort to do so. So the time has come for the Supreme Court to step in and uphold President Trump’s order that restores peace to our immigration system. Stealing the power of the great people who work hard to control our border and greatness is a red line that the Supreme Court cannot allow a Federal Differential Iarch.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
google.com, pub-2981836223349383, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0