If you think AI-generated videos are getting real, now you have something more to add to that list.
According to music streaming platform Deezer, most people can’t tell AI-produced music without a real deal written and performed by real people.
In a joint study with the market research company Ipsos, Deezer asked 9,000 people across eight countries – the United States, Canada, Brazil, the United States, Germany, and Japan – to listen or not. A whopping 97% of respondents failed this task.
Participants in Deezer’s process were divided on how to view the findings, with 52% finding it uncomfortable not being able to tell the difference. 51% of survey respondents also said they think AI will lead to very low quality, generic music (AKA AI Slop).
Regardless of how they view AI’s role in music, 80% agreed that AI-generated music should be written clearly.
“The results of the survey clearly show that people care about music and want to know whether they are listening to AI tracks or not created by a human,” Deezer CEO Alexis Lanternarl said in a press release.
Labeling The use of AI in music is a hot topic. This discussion was developed earlier this year, when a rock band called “Velvet Sundown” was fired a million streams before it was revealed that the project was produced. It has led to increasing calls by musicians for clear labeling of AI Use of music.
Spotify said in September that it would begin supporting “a new industry standard for AI disclosure in music credits.” But a quick look at Velvet Sundown’s artist page shows that there’s no clear, cutting-edge writing yet.
Deezer ialer is obviously AI-generated content on its platform, but it’s home to a growing number of AI-generated songs. The French streaming company announced in September that 28% of the music uploaded to its site was entirely produced.
A possible reason why the music produced by AI was very difficult to distinguish from the real thing in Deezer’s tomb, and it is the same reason that AI musicians are trained to work harder than human musicians.
“And there is no doubt that there are concerns about how AI-generated music will affect the lives of musicians, creating music and that AI companies should not be allowed to train their models with copyrighted material,” LanceNerver said in a press release. 70 percent of respondents said they believed that the music made by Ayi threatened the lives of musicians.
It’s unclear where copyright law comes in here in relation to AI and music. Early signs are that the European Union may be focusing on artists. In a landmark case in Germany, a court ruled earlier this week that chatgpt of acalia had infringed copyright law by training its models with its song lyrics.
The story is different elsewhere.
Earlier this year, famous British singers such as Elton John and Dua Lipa called on the British government to cancel a change that will take place on how AI companies can use their work to train models. But that amendment failed.
AI-generated music wins again.
In April last year, leading artists from Billie Eilish to Aerosmith signed Aerosmith’s call for AI and digital music services to use AI-Music Generation technology, content or tools that undermine or replace the creativity of human songwriters and artists. ” A few months later, the leading group of studios Music Music, Sony, and military records filed a copyright law against the two popular AI Music Generation Starration, Sun and Udio.
But ahead of the year, the Universal music group announced that it did not stay out of court with Udio but also cooperated with a new company to create a new professional product exclusively for their music catalog.
Spotify also doubles down on AI. The broadcasting giant is already using the algorithm, expanding its algorithm and offering services such as “AI DJ” to imitate the host of the radio station by commenting on a personalized channel. The company also announced last month that it was planning to work with Sony, umg, Warner Music and others to develop “self-directed AI products.
“AI is the biggest technology breakthrough since the smartphone, and it’s reinventing how music is made and experienced,” Spotify President Gustav Söderström said in a press release. “Our company brings deep research expertise to this opportunity, and we are actively growing our AI team and capabilities to drive continued growth of the entire music ecosystem.”
AI isn’t just coming to your virtual playlist, though. The music industry is everywhere. Real lifestyles, people’s musicians rely on albums but they also have brand name shingles, podcast soundtracks, podcasts Off, phone calls, and other music that we take for granted as background music. In a world where AI takes over music, the works of these unknown musicians who create the soundtrack of our daily lives could be the first on the chopping block.
